This comes from here ... it's so good I have to quote most of it:
If you're a minority and you're selected for a job over more qualified candidates you're a "token hire."
If you're a conservative and you're selected for a job over more qualified candidates you're a "game changer."
Black teen pregnancies? A "crisis" in black America.
White teen pregnancies? A "blessed event."
If you grow up in Hawaii you're "exotic."
Grow up in Alaska eating moose burgers, you're the quintessential "American story."
If you name your kid Barack you're "unpatriotic."
Name your kid Track, you're "colorful."
If you're a Democrat and you make a VP pick without fully vetting the individual you're "reckless."
A Republican who doesn't fully vet is a "maverick."
If you spend 3 years as a community organizer growing your organization from a staff of 1 to 13 and your budget from $70,000 to $400,000, then become the first black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration drive that registers 150,000 new African American voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law professor, then spend nearly 8 more years as a State Senator representing a district with over 750,000 people, becoming chairman of the state Senate's Health and Human Services committee, then spend nearly 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state of nearly 13 million people, sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran's Affairs committees, you are woefully inexperienced.
If you spend 4 years on the city council and 6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people, then spend 20 months as the governor of a state with 650,000 people, then you've got the most executive experience of anyone on either ticket, are the Commander in Chief of the Alaska military and are well qualified to lead the nation should you be called upon to do so because your state is the closest state to Russia.
If you are a Democratic male candidate who is popular with millions of people you are an "arrogant celebrity".
If you are a popular Republican female candidate you are "energizing the base".
If you are a younger male candidate who thinks for himself and makes his own decisions you are "presumptuous".
If you are an older male candidate who makes last minute decisions you refuse to explain, you are a "shoot from the hip" maverick.
If you are a candidate with a Harvard law degree you are "an elitist-out of touch" with the real America.
If you are a legacy (dad and granddad were admirals) graduate of Annapolis, with multiple disciplinary infractions you are a hero.
If you manage a multi-million dollar nationwide campaign,> you are an "empty suit".
If you are a part time mayor of a town of 7000 people, you are an "experienced executive".
If you go to a south side Chicago church, your beliefs are "extremist".
If you believe in creationism and don't believe global warming is man made, you are "strongly principled".
If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and left your disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you're a Christian.
If you have been married to the same woman with whom you've been wed to for 19 years and raising 2 beautiful daughters with, you're "risky."
If you're a black single mother of 4 who waits for 22 hours after her water breaks to seek medical attention, you're an irresponsible parent, endangering the life of your unborn child.
But if you're a white married mother who waits 22 hours, you're spunky.
If you're a 13-year-old Chelsea Clinton, the right-wing press calls you "First dog."
If you're a 17-year old pregnant unwed daughter of a Republican, the right-wing press calls you "beautiful" and "courageous."
If you kill an endangered species, you're an excellent hunter.
If you have an abortion you're not a Christian, you're a murderer (forget about if it happen while being date raped.)
If you teach abstinence only in sex education, you get teen parents.
If you teach responsible age appropriate sex education, including the proper use of birth control, you are eroding the fiber of society.
4 comments:
The truly nice thing to do would be to reject both sides of these propositions and start talking about where each of these tickets actually stands on issues---but that will never happen--that is why the answer on the economy is "give them a thousand dollars except the robber barons" or "my opponent will raise your taxes" And neither one dares to even make a slogan(or even a position paper) when it comes to what to do with the serious problem of social security.
The people are as much to blame as the candidates--the politicians just take advantage of the electorate's shallowness.
And then everyone treats the whole thing as a football game--Democrats v. Republicans--and it just gets so totally stupid.
There are good and bad things about both sides, and it comes down to a weighing. But, most people make the effort. Democrats suck--Republicans rock---disgusting.
Fortunately, the founders of this country were very wary (after the French Revolution) of rule by the mob and made our system of government a Republic, which somewhat insulates the decision making from the ignorant impulses that the mob comes up with.
~Becky
thank you for posting this -- it says in a few succinct (and not so succinct) sentences what the press has been summarily ignoring.
orwell is a good point of reference. he knew how language could be perverted in the cause of facism. i don't know what disgusts me more about this campaign -- the mcain camp's rank hypocrisy, or the fact that so many people are falling for it.
as someone else said, in a democracy, the people get the government they deserve.
Thank you. I have a post up at www.erniewormwood.blogspot.com about the election. Your post is clear and brave as we all need to be in order to remain focused on championing change to a more truthful, dedicated to all people leadership for the USA.
Very true words... thanks.
Post a Comment